Essay about Andrew Jackson - 954 Words

Andrew Jackson was not plainly a common man or an aristocrat. He was in fact a combination of the two. Because he came into popularity on the frontier and was not of aristocratic decent he is often considered to be a common man. However, many facts about his life do not coincide with this stereotype. From the beginning of his career in Tennessee, he considered himself an aristocrat. As a result his tastes, manners and life style were shaped accordingly. Although he considered himself, an aristocrat he was similar to the common man in that he could not spell and he lacked education and culture. However, this was not unusual of aristocrats from the southwest region. Many of them were not born aristocrats but merely rose from middle or†¦show more content†¦The banks that had overextended themselves were forced to press their debtors to repay their loans. Through the process of foreclosure, banks and particularly the national bank became absentee owners of Western and Southern p roperty. Jackson who lived in the west saw what was happening and consequently his resentment towards the national bank grew. Jackson also loathed the national bank for economic as well as political reasons. He thought the law that had created the bank was unconstitutional. He criticized the bank for failing to establish a quot;uniform and soundquot; currency. Jackson favored a quot;hard moneyquot; policy that was based strictly on currency, or gold and silver. Jackson also attacked the bank as a monopoly. He said its vast powers threatened democratic government because it meddled in politics. All the events that Jackson experienced along with his personal feelings helped him to make the decision to veto the bill that would charter the national bank for an additional term nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In the early 1820amp;#8217;s Jacksonamp;#8217;s military career had ended and there began talk of electing him as President. In 1824, the presidential election took place. Four candidates all from the same party were running against each other because during this time we became primarily a single party system. The candidates included Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, and William H. Crawford. Although AndrewShow MoreRelatedAndrew Jackson1431 Words   |  6 Pages Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United Stated of America, was born on March 15, 1767 and died on June 8, 1845 in Nashville, Tennessee. Jackson’s parents Andrew and Elizabeth Hutchinson Jackson were Presyberitains, Scots-Irish settlers whom in 1765 emigrated from Ireland. Andrew’s birthplace is deduced to have been at one of his uncles houses in the Waxhaw’s area between North Carolina and South Carolina, his exact whereabouts is unknown. Jacksons mothe r emigrated across the AppalachianRead MoreAndrew Jackson : The Age Of Jackson1376 Words   |  6 Pagesknown as â€Å"The Age of Jackson†, America was a country on its way to the West. America’s revolutionary generation was quickly fading, making room for a new balance of political power. As the class systems were breaking down, the â€Å"common man† was better able to cast his vote for the new President. Jackson was glorified by his impressive war accomplishments and humble background of the frontier. This made him the main target for presidency in election 1824. Once coming to power, Jackson no longer portrayedRead MoreThe Age Of Jackson By Andrew Jackson Essay1267 Words   |  6 Pages â€Å"The Age of Jackson† was a time when the high society aristocrats were threatened by the commoner. Jackson was a common man himself; orphaned as a boy, Jackson, rose to the top and became an admired general and commander in chief. Jackson affected the outlook on the class system, the method of electing our president, the spread of the spoils system, the fighting between the north and the south, the interactions between America and the Indians, and he helped lead our country to inflation. With Jackson’sRead MoreThe Life Of Andrew Jackson Essay1625 Words   |  7 Pages The Life of Andrew Jackson Michael J. Ford Jr. Central High School November 9, 2015 4th Period â€Æ' Abstract In my paper I while inform you of the United States 7th president Andrew Jackson. My paper consists of interesting facts about Mr. Jackson. It isn’t like what you read about in regular history books. Although some are random there fun facts that you may or may not know about my topic. The Life of Andrew Jackson Andrew Jackson was born Friday March 15, 1767. He was raised in WaxhawRead MoreThe Legacy Of Andrew Jackson1090 Words   |  5 PagesAndrew Jackson America’s history is rich and full of countless heroes, scandals, and incredible stories. Perhaps one of the most interesting of those stories is that of Andrew Jackson’s. To some, he was a hero, but to others, he was their worst enemy. Being raised in the mountains of the Carolinas, he became the first â€Å"backcountry president† of the United States (Wilentz, 13). His fame, though, began years before his presidency. Jackson’s reputation was established during the War of 1812, namelyRead MoreThe Legacy Of Andrew Jackson1365 Words   |  6 PagesConceived in time of poverty, Andrew Jackson had turned into a rich Tennessee lawyer. When the time came and the war broke out between Britain and the United States, his administration in that conflict earned Jackson national fame as a military legend. He would then go on to turn into America s most influential and polarizing political figure between the 1820s and 1830s. After barely losing to John Quincy Adams in the 1824 presidential race, Jackson returned four years after the fact to win reclamationRead More Andrew Jackson Essay1388 Words   |  6 Pages Andrew Jackson Andrew Jackson, born in 1767 was a child of poor Scotch-Irish immigrants. He ended up with enough education to be qualified to practice law. Jackson’s father died before he was born. The Revolutionary War started soon after he was born. It was very bloody in the wild and poor country where they lived. Jackson at the age of 13, joined a regiment. He was captured by the British, was wounded and nearly killed by a sword to the face for not polishing a British officers boots. He andRead More Andrew Jackson Essay1079 Words   |  5 Pages Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States, was born the Waxhaw territory, lying between North and South Carolina on March 15, 1767. Jackson was the third child of Scotch-Irish parents. His father died as the result of a logging accident just a few weeks before Andrew was born. Jacksons mother, Elizabeth Hutchison Jackson, was regarded as a very independent woman. After her husbands death, she raised her three sons at the home of one of her relatives. The Declaration of IndependenceRead MoreThe Legacy Of Andrew Jackson1523 Words   |  7 PagesAndrew Jackson was born on March 15, 1767 to Scots-Irish colonists Andrew and Elizabeth Hutchinson Jackson in the mountains between North and South Carolina. Jackson was born into poverty and as a result received very little education growing up. When The British invaded the Carolinas around 1780, Jackson’s mother and two brothers were killed during the conflict and British soldiers took the young Andrew Jackson prisoner, leaving him with a lifelong hostility toward Great Britain. In 1781, JacksonRead More Andrew Jackson Essay981 Words   |  4 PagesAndrew Jackson No one can argue that as a president, Jackson made no mistakes; however, they in no way disqualify him from having a place on the U.S. twenty dollar bill. Jackson made every decision according to the will of the American people, even the more unsavory ones. He was a war hero that exemplified the strength and tenacity by which America has defined itself over the generations. He acted in all ways with concern for the growth of the American nation, both at home and overseas. Even his

Transgender Inequality Human Dignity.that Is Why We...

Transgender Inequality M. Georgia Valdes November 12th, 2015 SYG 2010 Social Problems â€Å"As Americans we respect human dignity†¦.That is why we defend free speech, and advocate for political prisoners and condemn the persecution of women, or religious minorities, or people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender.† This is the first time that a president has said the word â€Å"transgender† in the State of the Union address. These words were not said by any accident and should not be taken lightly. All the cases he named are actually some of the most widely discriminated groups of people in the country, as well as the world. The group i’d like to analyse is that of the transgender community. I myself as well as people who are dear to me do not identify with the socially â€Å"correct† understanding of gender or sexuality. August 14th of this year marks the 15th murder of a trans individual, an all time high. (Time) Subsequently, I’ve witnessed hate, and I now hope to have a clearer understanding through a sociological analysis. Using the theories and tools of thought I will explore discriminatory actions taken against them, how these actions affect their standards of living and even their personal health. Understanding this, then I’d like to speak on what we a s a first world are repairing these issue in comparison to other nations. It begins even in youth, with 80% of questioning and confused children reporting bullying and harassment in school. (Time) One

The Constant Free Essays

â€Å"The Constant† is an episode from the fourth of six seasons of the critically acclaimed drama series, Lost, which aired on the American Broadcasting Company between September 2004 and May 2010. The initial opening of Lost begins with a plane crash on a deserted island. Throughout the extent of the series, the survivors of the crash are challenged by fear of the unknown island, desperation for food and water, and most importantly, each other. We will write a custom essay sample on The Constant or any similar topic only for you Order Now The deserted island in which the series takes place is not Just any island – that is, it is not able to be found by anyone living outside of it – and once the characters are iving there, they essentially have no way out. They are trapped, and can be found by no one. There is a mysterious group of civilians who are called â€Å"The Others† living on the island when Oceanic flight 81 5 crashes. This group of â€Å"Others† is part of the scientific research organization called the â€Å"Dharma Initiative† which has placed several stations at differing locations on the island, a sequence of numbers that seems to appear in lives of characters from the past, present, and future and personal connections among characters of which they are unaware. The main character of focus in the episode â€Å"The Constant† is Desmond Hume, a man who was captured on the island long before Oceanic flight 81 5 crashed. He is residing in the hatch, an underground room that supposedly releases an electromagnetic charge to prevent a large buildup of electromagnetic energy. Desmond is forced by the means of survival to punch numbers into a computer for several years, told that if he refuses to punch the numbers the world as he knows it will come to an end. At one point, Desmond misses the timer on the computer and does not punch in the numbers on time. As a result, a massive electromagnetic field is released, attracting all metal object to the hatch, and consequentially causing Oceanic flight 815 to crash on the island. Desmond manages to stop and therefore safely disperse the electromagnetism by punching the code into the computer after it hits zero, but is too late to prevent the plane from crashing. By season four, Desmond has already begun to interact with the survivors on the island. In the previous season, Charlie, another survivor from the Oceanic 81 5 crash, had come into contact with Desmond’s old girlfriend Penny, and informs Desmond hat a boat which a woman by the name of Naomi had brought to the island, did not in fact belong to Penny as Naomi had claimed. Charlie then drowns, leaving Desmond with several unanswered questions. Realizing that Naomi’s story is false, Desmond gets on a helicopter with Sayid and Frank to fly to the freight. As the helicopter flies through a storm, Desmond begins to have flashbacks of a familiar reality to his past in 1996 before his life on the island. Shifting back and forth between the past and the present forces Desmond to lose all memory of the island and Sayid, who is accompanying him on the helicopter. Sayid’s concern leads him to contact Daniel Faraday, a man on the island from the freighter, in order to receive some kind of answer to what Desmond is experiencing. Daniel explains that what Desmond is experiencing is actually a form of time travel, and explains to Desmond that when he reverts back to 1996 again, he needs to find Daniel at Oxford University and seek out his help. Here, Daniel performs a test on his pet rat, Eloise, and realizes that Desmond is experiencing a shift of consciousness through time travel. Eloise dies within less than two hours due to the stress to her brain. Daniel informs Desmond that in order to stop the time travel, he must find a ‘constant’, something that exists in both 1996 and 2004, the present year. A man strapped to a bed on the freighter by the name of Minkowski is experiencing the same consciousness travel as Desmond but for a longer period of time, and due to the high stress once again caused by the time travel, and the fact that he is unable to find a constant, Minkowski also dies. Frightened, Desmond chooses Penny to be his constant and realizes that in order to fulfill it, he must acquire Penny’s phone number and call her from the freighter on December 24, 2004, that day. When Desmond travels back in time once again to 1996, he finds Penny angry and unwilling to speak to him, but explains himself and pleads, saying he needs her phone number and promises not to call for eight years. With the help of Sayid, Desmond uses a phone located on the freighter to call Penny and finds out she has been searching for him for the past three years and she knows about the island. Back on the island, Daniel is searching through his old Journal in which he wrote notes during his time at Oxford, and found an old not he had written, â€Å"If nything goes wrong, Desmond Hume is my constant. † This episode of Lost is an excellent work and is full of several artistic and technical hallmarks, some of which are displayed best in the physical and emotional pain Desmond experiences through his time travel between 1996 and 2004. It is obvious throughout the episode until the end that Desmond is having many difficulties controlling his actions due to the fact that he is unable to control when his body switches between the two years. In 1996, he wants to obey his sergeant major’s commands when he is in the army, but his consciousness is reacting in ways he is nable to control and he is therefore unable to fulfill any of his responsibilities. Desmond’s lack of concentration causes the sergeant major to become so angry that he forces all of the army men to complete extra physical labor. Desmond then leaves to find Daniel Faraday and is again unable to control his conscious actions. He is desperate to find an answer to what is happening to him, and begs Daniel for his help. Desmond witnesses Minkowski die on the freighter due to the same problems he himself is having, and recognizes that if he does not find a constant, he will soon die. When Desmond needs to find Penny to be his constant, he again experiences great frustration because she is initially unwilling to speak to him. However, when she finally gives in and offers Desmond her phone number, Desmond returns to 2004 and immediately calls her to find that she has been searching for him for three years. The episode then presents to the viewer a glimpse of Desmond again in 1996, where he is smiling with gratitude. Harmony is present once Desmond is able to connect with Penny and he is finally able to complete his mission and bring an end to the once unstoppable and unwanted time travelling experiences. The Constant† is not harmonious until this point in the episode, when Desmond realizes that his long-lost love is searching for him and knows about the island. This also represents an element ot ‘Lite and Death’ because when Desmond witnesses Minkowski’s realizes it is absolutely necessary to find a constant in order to survive. Both the acting and cinematography in this episode as well as in the entire series is incredible. It is a turning point in the series because it introduced time travel as no longer a question in the world of Lost, but an actual that is definitely possible. This lone answered several questions for the viewer. The episode explained why Desmond lost his memory and why time travel occurs; and new, important characters are introduced as well. Faraday is notably in this episode one of the most important characters because he is able to explain the time travel Desmond is experiencing – and how to stop it – and seems to understand the island better than anyone else. How to cite The Constant, Papers

Conversing On Ethics Morality And Education â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Conversing On Ethics Morality And Education? Answer: Introducation The society is governed by laws that are legislated as well as moral principles that regulate conduct personal conduct. The body of moral principles and values can be referred to as ethics and can be used by individuals and organizations in the course of conducting business. Ethical dilemmas arise when three conditions manifest in a situation. The first is that the situation should present alternatives of action while the second is that the best course of action should be chosen amongst the choices given. The third is that no matter what choice is taken, some ethical principles may end up being compromised. In the ethical case study at Fabio, the best decision is for Brockley to confess to Iris and be prepared for any outcome that may ensue. Case Study: Question one Relevant facts- The case study at Fabio presents a number of facts. Harry is presented as having a reputation of being competent as a programmer internally and externally. He also has extensive knowledge of all the problems concerned with Fabios security infrastructure. He manages to develop anti-virus software that shows the potential of having market success. Jill is presented as neither making the decision without consulting her superior nor giving Harry the opportunity to test the product he was offering. Jills boss, Brockley supported her decision based on the negative bias he had formed towards Harry. Iris Bigg the owner of the company has learned about Harry under the pseudonym Lock Smith and wants to hire him. Ethical issues- The first ethical issue is whether it was right for Harry to develop the anti-virus software privately and for him to present his product to his employer while still employed? (Kilpatrick, 2010). His actions could lead to other employees copying his actions and this may reduce focus on organizational productivity at the expense of personal gain. The second dilemma is the decision by Jill to not only reject the offer by Harry but also to dismiss him without giving him the chance to test his product. Brockleys action to validate Jills action was unethical based on his negative bias toward Harry and poses an ethical dilemma. Both of their actions could lead to Harry instituting legal action for wrongful dismissal. Stakeholders involved- Harry is representative of one group of stakeholders in his personal capacity as well as that of fellow employees. The outcome of the case will affect him and the employees and set a precedent. The other stakeholders are the management and what actions the company owner might take. This will affect their future code of conduct in the future while dealing with employees. The third stakeholder is Bigg who stands to lose if Harry institutes legal action against Fabio. He also stands to lose on the opportunity of employing a talented person who has shown himself to be innovative and therefore an asset in the field of IT. Question two: Four-step Ethical Analysis and Decision Making Process Step 1. Understanding the Situation Facts of the case Harry is a bona fide, competent and currently employed at Fabio. He is acknowledged internally and outside of Fabios for being knowledgeable in IT security issues. He has managed to privately develop anti-virus software using his own resources. He approaches Jill who is his immediate superior with the proposal to sell his software that not only rejects it but also terminates his contract. Harry has been out of employment for two weeks but is promoting his software on the internet under the pseudonym Lock Smith. The action of Jill is validated by Brockley who is the overall boss and immediate superior to Jill. Biggs learns about Lock Smith through a private head-hunter and wants to hire him not knowing that he is Harry, his former employee. Facts involving ethical issues The first ethical issue is whether it is right for Harry as an employee to work privately, develop software and propose to sell to his employer. This could raise issues of conflict of interest and personal integrity as an employee (Varelius, 2015). Should he have resigned first or should he have freely given the product to his employer? Jill rejects the offer without the courtesy she would have extended to an outside vendor. She is condescending in her attitude and adds insult to injury by terminating Harrys employment (Quade, Greebaum Petrenko, 2017). She acts unprofessionally by taking a unilateral decision without consulting her senior and only reports the issue later. Brockley displays personal bias and does not take time to review the facts leading to the termination of Harrys contract at Fabio (Ellard, 2007). As the overall manager of the IT department, he displays the lapse of judgment based on personal misgivings on a product that could solve the companies IT security problems. Stakeholders in the case The first stakeholder is Harry in his private capacity and as a representative of the other employees. His job is a programmer and is expected to offer his expertise to his employer with their best interest at the forefront (Molnar, Kletke Chongwatpol, 2008). He stands to suffer professional reputation as an employee who used his employers time and resources to pursue his own private gain. As the representative of other employees, his fate will determine how employees will be handled by Fabio in the future should they take on the same course. The management is the second stakeholder in the case study. This includes Jill, Brockley and other managers in the company. The determination of the case will result in management changes which may curtail some of their authority as well as the dismissal of others. Their relationships with employees and their professional codes of conduct will be affected by the outcome of the case. The role of management is to oversee the daily company operations, encourage employee participation and refer issue beyond their authority to the senior management or the owner. Biggs who is the owner is the last stakeholder in this case. He stands to lose in several ways. He would have a lost talented, innovative employee if Harry declines his offer to come back and work for Fabio. Harry might end up working for a competitor and this may put his company at a disadvantage. He also stands to lose financially if Harry institutes legal proceedings for unfair dismissal and the company is forced to pay him damages (Armstrong, 2014). He would suffer financial lose as the substantive owner of the company. Step 2. Isolate the Major Ethical Dilemma The major ethical dilemma in this case study is centered on Brockley who has been asked by the owner to find Smith Lock and offer him a position at Fabio. This puts Brockley in the difficult position of having to decide whether he will own up to Iris as to what transpired at Fabio that led to the dismissal of Harry or not (Perugini, Constantini, Hughes De Houwer, 2016). There are consequences of the decision he will make which will harm some individuals including him. Consequentialism If action in step II is done, Brockley and Jill stand to be harmed in terms of disciplinary action or being dismissed. If action in step II is not done, Harry stands to be harmed in suffering professional reputation. Iris also stands to be harmed in losing a valuable employee. The least harm will be experienced if step I is taken. In the worst case scenario, both Jill and Brockley may be fired. At the very least, they may face disciplinary action. This is better when compared to the alternative of Harry suffering damage to his reputation and suing Fabio. At the same time, he may decide to work for Fabios competitors. This is based on the utilitarianism concept of taking the action that will benefit other employees as well as us (Toppinen, 2016). Owning up gives him the chance to remedy his error of judgment and clear his conscience. At the same time, the expertise and innovation that Harry will bring back will benefit Fabio as a company and the employees as a whole. If action in step II is done, Harry stand to benefit by coming back justified and as a valuable employee. Iris also stands to benefit by getting back an innovative employee who could have gone to work for her competitor. The employees will also benefit from the expertise Harry will bring back at Fabios. If step II is not done, Harry will benefit by either going to work for Fabios competitor with better remuneration, suing the company or both. Fabios competitor will also benefit in case he decides to work for them in bringing confidential information that will work to their favor. According to the theory of altruism, an individual may take the action that produces the most benefits for everyone except for himself. In this case, Brockley deciding to own up the truth and trying to find Harry would yield the most benefit to everyone else. Iris may benefit by getting back a valuable employee, Harry gets the opportunity to clear his reputation and work in a company he likes. The employees benefit in the knowledge that future dismissals will have to follow the laid down company due process. Consequentialism Comments: Minimum harm is based on the concept of altruism where actions result in others even at the expense of harming the person doing the action (Andric Tanyi, 2016). Maximum benefit results are based on the utilitarianism theory that the action is justified if it avails maximum benefits for all. Rights and Duties: Harry had the right to know what the company policy is with regards to employees who privately developed their own privately resourced products. He had the right to privacy at the same time in controlling personal information. He had the right to intellectual property as set out in the law (Lambert, 2009). Iris had the right to know what her employee had developed while working for her. Duties: Jill and Brockley neglected their duties to do justice in handling Harry. They were also negligent with regards to practicing nonmaleficence and beneficence towards Harry (Valerica Daniel, 2011). Iris has the duty to make appropriate reparation to Harry for the loss of employment that covers two weeks. Comments on Rights and Duties: The actors in the case study have duties and rights which may be reciprocal by nature according to the theory of deontology (Juth, 2014). Jill has the duty to do justice while Harry has the right to the same. Kant Categorical Imperative: If action in step II is done, Brockley and Jill will be treated with disrespect. If action is not done in step II, Iris will be disrespected indirectly in the show of insubordination by Brockley. The best alternative is for Jill and Brockley to suffer disrespect which may be temporary. The owner of the company may decide not to dismiss Jill and Brockley. If she discovers that her order was disrespected, she will most probably fire both without a second thought. If action in step II is done, Harry will be treated differently from the other employees as one with more value. Jill and Brockley may be treated by the employees with less respect compared to other managers. If action in step II is not done, Brockley will be treated unlike no other manager has been treated. Not only may he be fired, legal proceedings may be instituted against him. The best alternative is to be treated with less respect rather than face the prospect of being fired and being sued at the same time. If everyone did action in step II, the benefit will be to Harry, Iris and the company at large. Employees will benefit in having a more stable and secure working environment. If nobody took action, nobody stands to benefit. The best alternative is for everyone to take action: Iris, Harry and Brockley. Step III Discussion The ethical dilemma in this case study has different outcomes which may have positive or negative outcomes. While consequentialism may focus on the outcomes of actions, it has shortcomings with regards to moral character and its development (Betzler, 2008). The consequences of actions in themselves have no content that is ethical. Kants Categorical Imperative assumes that all involved in the case have the same respect for moral law. This assumption in the case makes room for different outcomes and voids the principle of consistency. The rights and duties theory presents the challenge of the reciprocal nature of rights and duties. One persons duty is expected to be the right of the next person. The reciprocity should be founded on goodwill and this may not be the case in most cases. Goodwill may be equated to a person being of good intention or meaning well (Silber, 2012). Goodwill in turn assumes the person has moral worth in doing good. Sibel (2008), states therefore that the rights and duties theory becomes difficult to enforce in an environment that is diverse such as the workplace. Making the Decision The best decision that can be made in this case study is for Brockley to own up to Iris first before embarking on locating Harry. Not being frank and forthright may result in consequences which may be direr. While meeting Iris, sending a reconciliatory message to Harry with his final intentions should also be done. Iris has the right to know according to the theory of deontology what the material facts are (Figar Dordevic, 2016). At the same time, Brockley has the duty to do justice to Harry by confessing to Iris, be truthful and act with integrity. His actions will be in alignment with the theory of teleology of minimizing the harm already done and maximizing benefits for all psychology Harry returns. Steps in the decision making process Brockely approaches Iris with the view to confess and own up. This is based on egoism and how the decision affects him. Konczal (2012), states that this is the starting point to work towards self-improvement in the future in ethical behavior. Send a message or emissary to contact Harry with the message of reconciliation and intention to hire him back. This is the utilitarianism assumption that this action has significant impact on other people (Bialek Wim De, 2017). Prepare himself and Jill psychologically for any outcomes which may be disciplinary. Accept the decision that Iris may take and accept it as his duty to do justice. This may involve making appropriate reparation to Harry or sacking Jill. Ethical dilemmas occur when the decision taken may end up compromise some ethical principles. The case study at Fabio presents an ethical dilemma that primarily rests with Brockley. There are diverse outcomes that may result depending on the choice he may make. Utilizing the different theories of ethical behavior may help in coming to the best decision in this case study. This involves listing the facts, the stakeholders and the different theoretical postulations. The best decision in this case is for Brockley to confess to Iris, approach Harry with a reconciliatory tone and be prepared for any outcome which may affect him. References Andri?, V., Tanyi, A. (2016). Multi-Dimensional Consequentialism and Risk. Ethical Theory Moral Practice, 19(1), 49-57. doi:10.1007/s10677-015-9658-5 Armstrong, J. (2014). Rethinking the restorativeretributive dichotomy: is reconciliation possible? Contemporary Justice Review, 17(3), 362. doi:10.1080/10282580.2014.944796 Betzler, M. (2008). Kant's Ethics of Virtue. Berlin: De Gruyter. Bia?ek, M., Wim De, N. (2017). Dual processes and moral conflict: Evidence for deontological reasoners' intuitive utilitarian sensitivity. Judgment Decision Making, 12(2), 148-167. Ellard, G. (2007). MORAL JUDGMENTS AND BUSINESS ETHICS. Vital Speeches of the Day, 73(5), 193-196. Figar, N., ?or?evi?, B. (2016). MANAGING AN ETHICAL DILEMMA. Economic Themes, 54(3), 345-362. Hurley, P. (2017). Why Consequentialism's "Compelling Idea" Is Not. Social Theory Practice, 43(1), 29-54. Juth, N. (2014). The Right Not to Know and the Duty to Tell: The Case of Relatives. Journal of Law, Medicine Ethics, 42(1), 38-52. Kilpatrick, P. (2010). The Relationship Between Technology and Ethics. Vital Speeches of the Day, 76(12), 567-570. Konczal, E. (2012). Everything You Need to Know About Business Ethics. [Newmarket, Ont.]: BrainMass Inc. Lambert, J. (2009). Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights : A Concise Guide for Businesses, Innovative and Creative Individuals. Farnham, England: Routledge. McGavin, P. A. (2013). Conversing on ethics, morality and education. Journal Of Moral Education, 42(4), 494-511. doi:10.1080/03057240.2013.817330 Molnar, K., Kletke, M., Chongwatpol, J. (2008). Ethics vs. IT Ethics: Do Undergraduate Students Perceive a Difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 657-671. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9646-3 Perugini, M., Costantini, G., Hughes, S., De Houwer, J. (2016). A functional perspective on personality. International Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 33-39. doi:10.1002/ijop.12175 Quade, M. J., Greenbaum, R. L., Petrenko, O. V. (2017). 'I don't want to be near you, unless...': The interactive effect of unethical behavior and performance onto relationship conflict and workplace ostracism. Personnel Psychology, 70(3), 675-709. Sibel, G. (2008). The relation between work ethics and work morality and the factors effecting work ethics in work-life. International Journal of Human Sciences, Vol 5, Iss 1, P 373 (2008), (1), 373. Silber, J. (2012). Kant's Ethics : The Good, Freedom, and the Will. Boston: De Gruyter. Toppinen, T. (2016). RULE CONSEQUENTIALISM (AND KANTIAN CONTRACTUALISM) AT TOP RATES. Philosophical Quarterly, 66(262), 122-135. doi:10.1093/pq/pqv065 Valerica, M., Daniel, M. M. (2011). RESPONSIBILITY FOR ETHICS IN ITC. Annals of the University Of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 20(1), 814-820. Varelius, J. (2015). Is the Non-rivalrousness of Intellectual Objects a Problem for the Moral Justification of Economic Rights to Intellectual Property? Science Engineering Ethics, 21(4), 895-906. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9574-4